Legal Opinion

PECO Energy Co. v. Township of Upper Dublin

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether Upper Dublin Township (Township) has the authority to regulate the manner in which a public utility trims shade trees within the Township’s public rights-of-way. The Montgomery County Common Pleas Court (trial court) granted PECO Energy Company’s (PECO) motion for judgment in mandamus. It held the Township possesses no authority to regulate PECO’s vegetation management practices, which fall within the Public Utility Code’s 1 definition of “utility service” and are solely regulated by the Pennsylvania Public Utility…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Duff v. Township of NorthamptonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. York Water Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. City of Lancaster and PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. UGI Utilities, Inc. v. City of Reading and PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. The Delaware Riverkeeper Network v. Sunoco Pipeline, L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Great Lakes Energy Partners v. Salem TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. UGI Utilities, Inc. v. City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API