Legal Opinion

McSloy v. Jeanes Hospital

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 1988No. 961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

Appellants, Joseph and Patricia McSloy, appeal from the dismissal of their medical malpractice action and entry of non pros for their failure to identify expert witnesses and answer expert witness interrogatories as directed by the trial court. We affirm.

The facts leading up to the dismissal of appellants’ cause of action are thoroughly set forth in Opinion of the Honorable Bernard J. Avellino as follows:

On November 2, 1981, Joseph McSloy burned his ankle in an industrial accident and was taken to Jeanes Hospital where he received outpatient care. He was unhappy with his care…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Gill v. McGraw Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Dion v. Graduate Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Curran v. Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. RossiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Steinfurth v. LaMannaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Lawrence v. General Medicine Ass'n Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Conner v. TomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Beyer v. Epstein, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API