Legal Opinion

Curran v. Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1987No. 01085 and 01111PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Plaintiff, Victor S. Panaccion (“Panaccion”), brought a claim of legal malpractice against the defendant law firm, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young (“Stradley”). After the jury returned a verdict against Stradley in the amount of $500,000.00, the trial court granted, in part, Stradley’s judgment n.o.v., reducing the verdict to $243,000.00. Both parties now appeal. We find that a new trial is required and, accordingly, vacate the order and remand the case for a new trial.

I. BACKGROUND

The seeds of this dispute were first sown in January of 1974, when Panaccion, the owner of a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Arthur Clark v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Cohen v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Taylor v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Cooper v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API