Curran v. Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
Plaintiff, Victor S. Panaccion (“Panaccion”), brought a claim of legal malpractice against the defendant law firm, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young (“Stradley”). After the jury returned a verdict against Stradley in the amount of $500,000.00, the trial court granted, in part, Stradley’s judgment n.o.v., reducing the verdict to $243,000.00. Both parties now appeal. We find that a new trial is required and, accordingly, vacate the order and remand the case for a new trial.
I. BACKGROUND
The seeds of this dispute were first sown in January of 1974, when Panaccion, the owner of a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Arthur Clark v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Cohen v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Taylor v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Cooper v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.