Conner v. Tom

CAVANAUGH, J.:

¶ 1 Did the trial court commit reversible error in precluding the plaintiff appellant from presenting a medical expert at the trial of this medical malpractice case?

¶ 2 As a result of the court’s preclusion order, appellant concedes that a subsequent summary judgment order was appropriately granted since he could no longer proceed with the case. The interlocutory preclusion order is the basis for the appeal.

¶ 3 The suit arises from the claim by Daniel Conner that he came under the care of appellee, Todd Tom, M.D., and pursuant to Tom’s recommendation, underwent a surgical…