Kirk v. Showell, Fryer & Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sadler,
Plaintiff was seriously injured by an automobile of the defendant company. It had been placed in charge of Gibboni, a regular employee, and, on the day in question, *589lie had been directed to deliver a bulky package, containing a hammock, to the office of the American Railway Express Company, secure a shipping receipt, and return. No direct authority had been given him to obtain assistance in performing this service, nor was he permitted generally to allow others to ridé in the motor while engaged in his employer’s business. On this occasion, he did take with Mm one…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Parry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Flanigan v. McLeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Geiss v. Twin City Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Fulton Farmers Ass'n v. BombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Muroski v. HnathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Newman v. SteuernagelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Corbin v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Jacobi v. Claude Nolan, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Texas & N. O. R. v. SchoenfeldTexas Supreme Court · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.