Hernandez v. Tanninen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENITEZ, District Judge:
Rolando Hernandez appeals the district court’s decision finding that any attorney-client or work product privilege between Hernandez and his prior attorney, Gregory Ferguson, was waived and ordering the production of all thirty-five documents referenced in a privilege log.
I
Hernandez filed suit against the City of Vancouver and Mark Tanninen in 2004, asserting claims for race and national origin discrimination based on disparate treatment, retaliation, and a hostile work environment while employed as a mechanic in the City’s Fire Shop. Additionally, he alleges that Mark…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re: Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Boon Global Limited v. Usdc-CaoakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Pacific Pictures Corp. v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.