Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Tanninen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 2010No. 09-35085PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENITEZ, District Judge:

Rolando Hernandez appeals the district court’s decision finding that any attorney-client or work product privilege between Hernandez and his prior attorney, Gregory Ferguson, was waived and ordering the production of all thirty-five documents referenced in a privilege log.

I

Hernandez filed suit against the City of Vancouver and Mark Tanninen in 2004, asserting claims for race and national origin discrimination based on disparate treatment, retaliation, and a hostile work environment while employed as a mechanic in the City’s Fire Shop. Additionally, he alleges that Mark…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. In Re: Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  3. Boon Global Limited v. Usdc-CaoakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Pacific Pictures Corp. v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API