Legal Opinion
Pacific Pictures Corp. v. United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 10, 2012No. 11-71844PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
In the opinion filed in this case on April 17, 2012, we referred to allegations of misconduct made against an attorney by the name of David Michaels. That opinion is hereby amended to reflect that there has been no finding of wrongdoing on the part of Mr. Michaels. The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. This order does not affect any petitions for rehearing currently before the court, but no further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
OPINION
We must decide whether a party waives attorney-client privilege forever by voluntarily…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Schaeffler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- United States v. Aguilera-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Chico Scrap Metal, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.