Legal Opinion
Morici v. Jarvie
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 11, 1950PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
This is an appeal by the defendants John H. Jarvie and Mary Jarvie, hereinafter referred to as the defendants, from two judgments which together adjudged a foreclosure of a mechanic’s hen of the plaintiff upon their property. The facts were found by a state referee. There was a remonstrance to his report which was overruled. No evidence was printed and the overruling of the remonstrance was not asssigned as error. The only errors assigned relate to the entry of the judgments upon the referee’s report.
The essential facts found by the referee are as follows: On April 26, 1946, the defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ferguson v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Valente v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Goldreyer v. CronanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Foley v. George A. Douglas & Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Potter v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Martin v. KavanewskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.