Legal Opinion

Docutel Olivetti Corp. v. Dick Brady Systems Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1986No. 20835PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice.

Defendants Dick Brady Systems, Inc., and Richard Brady appeal from an order of the Third District Court denying a motion to dismiss or stay this action pending arbitration.1 We reverse.

On February 17, 1982, Dick Brady Systems, Inc. (“Systems”), and Olivetti Corporation (“Olivetti”), a predecessor to plaintiff Docutel Olivetti Corporation (“Docu-tel”), entered into a contract under which Systems became an authorized Olivetti dealer. Paragraphs 10 and 12 of that agreement are at issue in this controversy. Paragraph 10 provides:

Dealer [Dick Brady Systems] hereby grants Olivetti a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. HiggsUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Stateside MacHinery Company, Ltd., a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of Great Britain and Armin Speigel v. Joel M. AlperinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Lindon City v. Engineers Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Rollings v. Thermodyne Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Bybee v. AbdullaUtah Supreme Court · 2008

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API