Legal Opinion

ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 2010No. 20090599PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

§1 This case presents two issues: (1) whether the district court has jurisdiction to find that a party waived its contractual right of arbitration under Utah Code section 78-3la-4 (1996), 1 and (2) whether the district court erred in holding that Wolf Mountain waived any potential contractual right to arbitration. We hold that the district court has such jurisdiction, and that it was correct in holding that Wolf Mountain waived any potential contractual right to arbitration.

BACKGROUND

T2 On July 3, 1997, Wolf Mountain Resorts, LC. (Wolf Mountain) and ASC Utah,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Republic Insurance v. Paico Receivables, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Shields Ltd. Partnership v. BradberryTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. D.A. Osguthorpe Family Partnership v. ASC Utah, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. GeoMetWatch v. BehuninCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. Jill P. Mitchell Living TrustDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  5. ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2013

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API