Legal Opinion

Mountain Home Irrigation District v. Duffy

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1957No. 8530PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Plaintiff (respondent) is the owner of a right to the use of 50,000 miners inches of the waters of Rattlesnake creek in Elmore County, for the irrigation of lands within its boundaries by decree filed May 31, 1917, with priority date of June 1, 1891. Plaintiff owns and maintains a reservoir on Rattlesnake creek known as the Mountain Home reservoir. Water from the creek is stored in this reservoir and is drawn therefrom and used as needed during the irrigation season in the irrigation of lands within the district.

August 7, 1917, a water license was issued by the state engineer…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. St. Onge v. BlakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Hall v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Despain v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Nelson v. MarshallIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Poole v. OlavesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Thomas v. Arkoosh Produce, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kunz v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API