Legal Opinion

Yost v. Hall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1951No. 379PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

64 S.E.2d 554 (1951)

233 N.C. 463

YOST

v.

HALL et al.

No. 379.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 18, 1951.

Linn & Shuford, Salisbury, for plaintiff appellee.

Deal & Hutchins, Winston-Salem, Craige & Craige, Salisbury, and Smith, Sapp, Moore & Smith, Greensboro, for defendant appellants, Myron H. Hall and William Francis Broaddus.

C. H. Gover, Charlotte, for additional defendant appellee, Retail Credit Co.

BARNHILL, Justice.

The absence of direct testimony in respect to the circumstances surrounding the collision is provocative of much speculation as to just what did happen. Such speculation might…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mockowik v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Reeves v. . StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Reeves v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Call v. StroudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Watson v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Hartley v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Scallon v. HooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API