Legal Opinion

Call v. Stroud

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1950No. 240PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.

A party who comes into the Supreme Court seeking relief from a judgment of the Superior Court must allege and show these two things: (1) That the judge of the Superior Court committed an error in a matter of law or legal inference; and (2) that such error affected prejudicially a substantial right belonging to him. An error cannot be regarded as prejudicial to a substantial right of a litigant unless there is a reasonable probability that the result of the trial might have been mate rially more favorable to bim if the error had not occurred. Stewart v. Dixon, 229 N.C. 737, 51 S.E. 2d 182;…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Perry v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Thigpen v. Farmers Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Butner v. . WhitlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Fourth National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. BovenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State ex rel. Freeman v. PonderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API