Legal Opinion
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 10, 1976No. Nos. 75-2259, 76-1181, 76-1245 and 76-1247Published
1Opinion
Supplemental Opinion on Petition for Rehearing
ORDER
On consideration of the petition of Velsicol Chemical Corporation for rehearing it is
ORDERED by the Court that the aforesaid petition for rehearing is denied.
Supplemental Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge LEVENTHAL.
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:
Velsicol argues in its petition for rehearing that in upholding the Administrator’s allocation of the burden of proof to the registrant this Court misinterpreted § 7(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act. Velsicol points out that the interpretation…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Philip Kerner v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Environmental Defense Fund, Incorporated v. William D. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and William D. Ruckelshaus, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Philadelphia Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.