Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 5, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1197 (RWR)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Grant Anderson, a District of Columbia parolee, brought this action against federal and District of Columbia government defendants 1 alleging that the parole condition requiring his registration as a sex offender under the District’s Sex Offender Registration Act of 1999 (“SORA”), D.C.Code §§ 22-4001-4017, violates the Eighth Amendment, the ex post facto and equal protection clauses of the Constitution, and the District’s Human Rights Act, Compl. ¶¶ 1, 16, and that his alleged participation in compelled “polygraph…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grant Anderson v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Daniels v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Tressler v. National Passenger Railroad Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Montgomery v. CuomoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Dixon v. Midland Mortgage Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.