State v. Travalini
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Defendant was indicted for arson in the first degree for intentionally damaging the property of another. ORS 164.325(l)(a)(A). The indictment also alleged that the arson “represented a threat of serious physical injury,” thereby exposing defendant to an enhanced sentence under an “offense-subcategory fact” set out in the sentencing guidelines but not the arson statute. At the close of the state’s case, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the state had failed to prove that he intended to injure another; according to defendant, the state had to prove intent with respect…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. FerrellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barrett v. BellequeOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. ProphetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.