Legal Opinion

In Re: Appeal of E.J. White

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1925No. Appeal 40PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Appellants enclosed, largely with glass, an open porch at the front of their house, converting it into a room. In doing so, they disregarded a zoning ordinance of the City of Pittsburgh, approved August 9, 1923, enacted pursuant to the Acts of June 21, 1919, P. L. 570, the Act of May 11, 1921, P. L. 503, and the Act of May 1, 1923, P. L. 122. They began work in July shortly before the ordinance was passed, but failed to apply for a building permit said to have been required at that time by another ordinance, and had almost completed the improvement when the city authorities…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Page Et Ux. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lindquist AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. DeBlasiis v. Bartell & OlivetoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Junge's Appeal. (No. 2.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Imperial Asphalt Corp. of Pennsylvania Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API