Legal Opinion

DeBlasiis v. Bartell & Oliveto

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1940No. Appeal, 103; Appeal, 135PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

These appeals are from decrees in equity (a) restraining the defendants, Bartell and Oliveto, from constructing an addition to the second story of Bartell’s property, situate at the northeast corner of 16th and Ritner Streets, 1 Philadelphia (known as No. 2351 South 16th Street), in violation of the Philadelphia zoning ordinance of August 10, 1933 (Book of Ordinances, 1933, p. 268), and ordering them to remove the unlawful construction; and (b) declaring an ordinance amending said zoning ordinance by changing the designation of BartelFs property from Class “A”…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. City of Aurora v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wakefield v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. State Ex Rel. Miller v. CainWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Putney v. Abington TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Page Et Ux. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Weaver v. HamTexas Supreme Court · 1950

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API