Legal Opinion

Lindquist Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1950No. Appeals, 124 to 128PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

The appellants — intervenors—appeal from the decree of the court of common pleas of Montgomery County setting aside the decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of Springfield ToAvnship Avherein the board refused to grant a variance from the terms and provisions of the Springfield Township Zoning Ordinance of 1940.

The appellee, Adolph Luther Lindquist, is the equitable OAvner of a lot and building situate on the northeasterly corner of Bethlehem Pike and HaAVS Lane in Springfield Township. He purchased the property Avith the intent to install and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Devereux Foundation, Inc., Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Gilfillan's PermitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Taylor v. Haverford TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Jennings' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Rolling Green Golf Club CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API