Legal Opinion
People v. Garner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that a prosecution witness’ testimony, that complainant told her that she had been raped and threatened with death if she told *1042anyone, improperly bolstered the testimony of the complainant and deprived defendant of a fair trial. Defendant failed to object to that testimony as improper bolstering. Thus, the issue has not been preserved for appellate review (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023, 1025; People v West, 56 NY2d 662, 663; People v Marks, 182 AD2d 1122; People v Minigan, 175 AD2d 648, lv denied 78 NY2d 1013).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. HendrixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. HarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. GilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. CrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993