Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Apple, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 15, 2024No. 3:22-cv-07668Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LAUREN HUGHES, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07668-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER PARTIALLY DENYING AND v. PARTIALLY GRANTING THE MOTION TO DISMISS APPLE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 50 Defendant. The AirTag is a small, affordable location-tracking device manufactured and sold by Apple. It is marketed as a convenient way to keep track of personal items, like car keys. The AirTag reports its location to its owner’s cell phone, so you can simply attach the AirTag to your car keys and then you can use your cell phone to find them. But people do not always use a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API