Bristol v. Fibreboard Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
In accordance with 10th Cir.R. 9(e) and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), this appeal came on for consideration on the briefs and record on appeal.
This is an appeal from an order and judgment, both entered on June 19, 1985. The order sustained a motion for summary judgment joined in by eighteen of the twenty-one defendants who were named in the complaint. Judgment was entered in favor of the same eighteen defendants. Of the remaining three defendants named in the complaint who were not dealt with in the judgment, two of them, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation (Johns-Manville) and Un-arco Industries, Inc.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Lamp v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
3Cited by29 opinions
- Raiser v. Utah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Kevin Paul Ferree v. Teresa W. Marianos, and Shapiro & Marianos, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Hutchinson v. PfeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- John Insinga, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mildred Insinga, Deceased v. Michelle Labella, Humana, Inc., D/B/A Biscayne Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- London v. BeatyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.