Legal Opinion
Hutchinson v. Pfeil
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1997No. 95-5269PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff — Appellant, Thomas R. Hutchinson (“Hutchinson”), brought this action un der § 43(a) of the Lanham Act 1 alleging that Richard and Mary Joan Pfeil (collectively “the Pfeils”) are falsely advertising the history of a certain painting in an art catalogue. Hutchinson has also joined as defendants Art Services International, Inc., the non-profit corporation which produced the catalogue; William H. Gerdts, David Bernard Dearinger, and Sona Johnston, the art historians who provided the historical annotations for the catalogue, and South China Printing Company (“South…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Gardner v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- H.B. Hunt and Lola N. Hunt v. Inter-Globe Energy, Inc., John A. Corrente, Forest N. Simon, Third-Party Glenda Perry Simon, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Westar Energy, Inc. v. LakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- New Mexico Ex Rel. State Engineer v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- I Dig Texas v. CreagerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.