Legal Opinion
Lamp v. Andrus
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 3, 1981No. 81-1562PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff-appellant filed a complaint in the district court for the District of New Mexico, after transfer from the district court for the District of Columbia, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) seeking review of a determination by the Secretary of the Interior and the Interior Board of Land…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Century Laminating, Ltd. v. Steven H. Montgomery, Individually and D/B/A Laminating Company of Colorado, and D/B/A American Laminating CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- A. O. Smith Corp. v. Sims Consolidated Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robert Lewis v. B.F. Goodrich Company Daniel Newsome Roy AilstockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Allen v. Minnstar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Bristol v. Fibreboard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Allen v. Minnstar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Smaha v. LandyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.