London v. Beaty
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
MICHAEL R. MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
In 2011, Patrick Neil London filed a federal civil rights action against Defendants, alleging they violated his fourth amendment right to be free from unreasonable- searches and seizures. London also raised Oklahoma state tort claims. The district court dismissed the fourth amendment claims pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), concluding London’s complaint failed to allege facts sufficient to *912state a claim for relief plausible on its face. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- WDIS v. Hi-CountryUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Bailey v. FranklinDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- Columbia Mutual Insurance Company v. Baloru Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023
- Cowen v. Walgreens Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- Daoud v. Weldnow, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.