Legal Opinion
Raiser v. Utah County
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 1, 2005No. 04-4019PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Aaron Raiser, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Utah County. The district court granted judgment based on admissions that Mr. Raiser was deemed to have made when he failed to respond within 30 days to the County’s requests for admissions. See FedR.Civ.P. 36(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because we believe that the district court abused its discretion by not allowing Mr. Raiser to amend his response to the request for admissions, we vacate the judgment in favor of Utah County, reverse the denial of Mr. Raiser’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Michael Perez v. Miami-Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Ollie B. Hadley, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Richard Prusia, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Richard PrusiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Deborah D. Bergemann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Michael J. Conlon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Cambridge Holdings Group, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Pedroza v. Lomas Auto Mall, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2009
- Zimmermann v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Luckett v. BodnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.