Oberkotter v. Woolman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. T. L. Lewis, E. A. Luce and C. N. Andrews, Judges. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. •
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages from the defendant for alleged slander. The demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Judgment dismissing the action followed, from which judgment this appeal was taken.
[1] The respondent makes a preliminary objection and seeks a dismissal of the appeal upon the ground that it was taken from the order sustaining the demurrer, which is not appealable. The notice of appeal states that the plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered on the twenty-seventh day of September, 1920. While the court sustained…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Turner v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Schomberg v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Tonini v. CevascoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bettner v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re GonsalvesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Smith v. Los Angeles Bookbinders Union No. 63California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Martin v. KearneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Sewell v. BrookbankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.