Legal Opinion

Witso v. Overby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 2001No. C6-99-1618PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

Respondent Benjamin Witso (Witso) seeks custody and visitation rights with his putative child M.R.O. and petitioned under the Minnesota Parentage Act (MPA)1 for a court order to compel the child’s mother, appellant Mary Overby (Overby), and M.R.O. to undergo blood or genetic testing to determine whether he is a presumed biological father of M.R.O. The district court granted Witso’s petition but, on Ov-erby’s motion, certified as important and doubtful the following question as recast by the court of appeals:

Must a paternity action be dismissed for lack of standing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. R.Mcg. v. J.W.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. N.A.H. v. S.L.S.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Morey v. PeppinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. In Re the Welfare of G.L.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters Minnesota v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In Re Estate of PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. In Re Estate of MartignaccoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Custody of the Child of Williams v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. In Re JesusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API