Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Schwab (In Re Maloney)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN J. THOMAS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Is a paralegal, employed in the office of counsel for a creditor, permitted to question a debtor at a meeting under 11 U.S.C. § 341?
This particular question comes to me by way of a Motion by Sears, Roebuck, & Company (“Sears”) to reconvene a first meeting of creditors for the Debtors John C. Maloney and Christine Maloney. The Motion was originally opposed by the Trustee, William C. Schwab, as well as the Debtors. Subsequent to the hearing on this issue, the Trustee withdrew his opposition to the Motion. Nevertheless, the Debtors continue to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Fitchette v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Dauphin County Bar Ass'n v. MazzacaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re CarlosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1998