Legal Opinion

In Re Carlos

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California

Decided May 20, 1998No. Bankruptcy LA 97-31026 SBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION FINDING THAT LAW FIRM HAS ENGAGED IN UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW

SAMUEL L. BUFFORD, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

This case raises the issue of whether a law firm may use a non-attorney to negotiate, on behalf of a creditor client, a reaffirmation agreement with a debtor in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case.

The court holds that, where a client hires a law firm to negotiate a contract, the negotiation of the contract constitutes the practice of law that must be performed by an appropriately licensed attorney. Thus, when a law firm uses a non-attorney to negotiate a contract on behalf of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Abeles v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Crawford v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Gassman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re KampsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chimko v. Lucas (In Re Lucas)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. In Re FergusonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  3. Staiano v. Schwab (In Re Maloney)District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API