Legal Opinion

Stover v. Winston Bros. Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1936No. 25832. Department OnePublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an action to recover wages for work performed by the plaintiff and a large number of other workmen whose claims were assigned to him, in the construction of the “Diablo Dam,” pursuant to a contract between the defendant corporation and the city of Seattle.

The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury, resulting in findings and conclusions favorable to the plaintiff and a judgment thereon for upwards of seventy thousand dollars. The defendant has appealed from that judgment, and the plaintiff has cross-appealed upon a minor issue. For convenience, therefore, we will refer to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. R. Connor Co. v. Ætna Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Shepard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Langdon v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pacific Northwest Shooting Park Ass'n v. City of SequimWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Wallace v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Hite v. Public Utility District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API