Legal Opinion

Patch v. Buros

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 9, 1966No. 1 CA-CIV 171PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

This appeal involves the procedural aspects for a motion for new trial and the disposition of the motion. A detailed chronology is appropriate to the consideration of the case.

Violet G. Patch was the plaintiff in a personal injury action and the jury returned a verdict in her favor. The verdict was reduced to a formal written judgment which was filed on 2 December 1963, and on the same day a motion for new trial was filed. The minutes reflect that the motion for new trial was argued on 12 December 1963, and the same minutes disclose the following:

“ORDER taking * * *…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Rogers v. TapoArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Zugsmith v. MullinsArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Harrington v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Arizona State Retirement Board v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blake v. RupeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Estate of HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Howard P. Foley Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Associates Finance Corporation v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Crosby v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API