Legal Opinion

State v. Hensley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1985No. 8417SC1326PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in allowing the State to impeach him on cross-examination with evidence of convictions more than ten years old. The State impeached defendant with evidence of two breaking and entering convictions and two larceny convictions that were thirteen years old at the time of his trial. Defendant served a sentence of “[a]bout seventeen months” for the thirteen-year-old convictions. G.S. 8C-1, Rule 609, provides in part:(a) General rule. — For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he had been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. DowningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. DowningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. MuhammadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Chapel Hill Cinemas, Inc. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. HolstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API