Newman v. Bullock
Supreme Court of Colorado
JError to the District Court of Arapahoe County. Proceedings in Contempt. In January, 1894, in the district court of Arapahoe county, the defendant in error filed his petition, naming as respondents the plaintiffs in error, Charles Newman and William L. Stephens, as president and secretary respectively of The Swansea Gold and Silver Mining Company, in which he asked that they be declared guilty of contempt for failure to comply with a judgment theretofore (in 1889) rendered…
Read the full summary
JError to the District Court of Arapahoe County. Proceedings in Contempt. In January, 1894, in the district court of Arapahoe county, the defendant in error filed his petition, naming as respondents the plaintiffs in error, Charles Newman and William L. Stephens, as president and secretary respectively of The Swansea Gold and Silver Mining Company, in which he asked that they be declared guilty of contempt for failure to comply with a judgment theretofore (in 1889) rendered against the said company, directing the officers thereof to issue to the petitioner a certificate for six thousand…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
In the answers of the respondents it is averred that upon the trial of the original action there was no issue joined, either as between Bullock, the original plaintiff, and the Swansea Mining Company, or as between the original defendants in that action and said company, or as between the State National Bank, as intervenor, and the said company, as to the validity or genuineness of the certificate of stock in con*222troversy, or the shares represented thereby, otherwise than as appears from the pleadings filed in that case, an abstract of which has been set out. For this reason it is urged that,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Smith v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
- Smith v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Mayer v. StahrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Miller v. ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. District Court of Eighth Jud. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- People ex rel. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Whitten v. CoitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.