Legal Opinion
Whitten v. Coit
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 9, 1963No. 20032PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
The controversy now presented for determination was before this court in an original proceeding entitled Prinster, et al., v. District Court, 137 Colo. 393, 325 P. (2d) 938. A majority of the court determined that the controlling question should not be decided in an original *159proceeding and that the cause should proceed to final judgment to which a writ of error should be directed.
A statement of the facts pertinent to our present inquiry is set forth in Prinster, et al., v. District Court, supra, as follows:
“In 1948 the District Court of Mesa County entered its decree in a general water…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Davidson Chevrolet, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Safranek v. Town of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Prinster v. District Court of Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Thompson v. McCormickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- United States National Bank v. BartgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- In re the Marriage of StroudSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Board of County Commissioners v. Park County Sportsmen's Ranch, LLPSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.