People ex rel. Attorney-General v. Reis
California Supreme Court
Appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, rendered upon an application for a writ of mandate. Cross-appeals were taken by the people and by the treasurer and auditor of the city and county. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This action was brought by the people of the state for a writ of mandate to compel defendant Edgar, as auditor of the city and county aforesaid, to make his official statement and certificate that certain sums of money, consisting of interest on the state’s portion of delinquent taxes collected by the said city and county for the fiscal year commencing with 1872-73 and ending with 1882-83, are in the hands of defendant Eeis, the above-named treasurer, and to command Eeis, as treasurer, to settle with the controller of the state for said sums, and to pay the same over to the treasurer of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Douglass and Others v. Reynolds and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
- Harper v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- McCullough v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Savings & Loan Society v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- County of San Diego v. MilotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Chicago v. People ex rel. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Long Beach City School District v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Wakefield v. BohlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- State Ex Rel. City of Wolf Point v. McFarlanMontana Supreme Court · 1927
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.