People ex rel. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co. v. Burke
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
The Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet and Irrigated Land Company and the Fort Lyon Canal Company, the former in this opinion styled the Storage Company, the latter the Canal Company, are domestic corporations organized to acquire, and each of them has acquired, and now is, and *488for many years has been, the owner and operator of an extensive and valuable irrigating system in the valley of the Arkansas River in southeastern Colorado. Neither corporation is the builder or original owner of its present system, having obtained the same by purchase or under a reorganization of a former corporation owner.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ex Parte RowlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Board of Com'rs v. PlattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- E. K. Buck Retail Stores v. HarkertNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. District Court of Eighth Jud. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- United States National Bank v. BartgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Beck v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.