Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Pacific Steel Boiler Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSenn, J.
The defendant Pacific Steel Boiler Corporation, appearing specially by Hubert L. Brown, its attorney, moves to set aside the alleged service upon it of the summons and complaint.
This defendant is really the Pacific Steel Boiler Corporation of Illinois, a foreign corporation, having its office, manufacturing plant and place of business at Waukegan, 111. There is also a corporation known as the Pacific Steel Boiler Corporation of New Jersey, having its manufacturing plant at Bristol, Penn., and its office and place of business at Waukegan, 111. The two corporations, as nearly as I can gather…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ray D. Lillibridge, Inc. v. Johnson Bronze Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Ray D. Lillibridge, Inc. v. Johnson Bronze CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Cochran Box & Manufacturing Co. v. Monroe Binder Board Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- In re LavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Martin v. Barrett-Cravens Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Warren Tool & Forge Co. v. MarcusOhio Court of Appeals · 1931