Legal Opinion
In re Lavin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 25, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
In a proceeding in the nature of mandamus, instituted pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to compel the corporate respondent, a foreign corporation, and the individual respondent, its president, to permit appellant to examine and inspect corporate books and papers, and for other relief, an order was duly entered, upon a cross-motion of the respondents, granting their motion to dismiss the petition upon the ground that the court has no jurisdiction over the corporate respondent, a Connecticut corporation which has not been shewn to do business in the State of New York within the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Cochran Box & Manufacturing Co. v. Monroe Binder Board Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- People ex rel. McInnes v. Columbia Paper Bag Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Meinhard, Greeff & Co. v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Johnson v. Pacific Steel Boiler Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- Newmark v. C & C Super Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Fisher v. MeyerowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Newmark v. C & C Super Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Williams v. Williams-McWilliams Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- La Vin v. La VinNew York Supreme Court · 1943