In Re the Arbitration Between Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. & Central Power & Light Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEIN, District Judge:
This matter is before this Court on the petition of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (“NEIL”) (1) to compel respondent Central Power and Light (“CPL”) to arbitrate, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 4, all of CPL’s claims that CPL has asserted against NEIL in an action filed in the state courts of Texas, and (2) to stay the pending Texas state court proceedings pending final disposition of the arbitration. Pursuant to an order to show cause signed on April 18,1996, this matter was heard on May 17, 1996. For the following reasons, the petition…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Great Earth Companies, Inc., and Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Richard Simons and Kimberly SimonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Solymar Investments, Ltd. v. Banco Santander S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc. v. BargerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Rainbow Investments, Inc. v. Super 8 Motels, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.