Legal Opinion
Pulkrabek v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 2, 1988No. C7-87-1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
In this action for damages caused by a dog bite, appellant Adrian Pulkrabek challenges the sufficiency of the damages awarded him. Respondent Roger Johnson seeks review of the trial court’s grant of conditional additur. We reverse the grant of additur.
FACTS
On April 1, 1985, Pulkrabek was petting Johnson’s labrador retriever when the dog suddenly bit his upper left lip. Pulkrabek was then a sixteen-year-old high school student, and he was visiting Johnson’s son.
Since Johnson admitted liability, trial was on damages only. Pulkrabek did not seek or introduce evidence of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Pehrson v. KistnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Jangula v. KlocekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Koenig v. LudoweseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Krutsch v. Walter H. Collin GmBh Verfahrenstechnik Und MaschinenfabricCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Rush v. JostockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Thompson v. HughartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Van Guilder v. National Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Pap-R-Products Company v. Studio 503, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.