Krutsch v. Walter H. Collin GmBh Verfahrenstechnik Und Maschinenfabric
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Respondent was injured while attempting to repair a machine manufactured by appellant. Respondent sued appellant, alleging defective design and failure to warn. The jury apportioned negligence as follows: 16.67% to respondent; 16.67% to appellant; and 66.67% to respondent’s employer. Appellant claims the trial court erred (1) in denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, new trial; (2) in not striking the jury’s award for future medical expenses; (3) in not applying the collateral source statute; and (4) in denying appellant’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hauenstein v. Loctite Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Lamb v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Ralph M. Johnson v. Niagara MacHine & Tool Works, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Folstad v. EderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. WoodCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Anderson v. Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Duane Dewey Anderson v. Ind. School Dist. 97Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Duane Dewey Anderson v. Ind. School Dist. 97Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.