Legal Opinion

Heim v. California Federal Bank

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 29, 2003No. AC 23105PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HEALEY, J.

The pro se plaintiff, Richard A. Heim, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered subsequent to its granting of the motion to strike filed by the defendant Reiner, Reiner and Bendett, P.C., a Connecticut law firm.1 This action involves the circumstances and conduct of the parties, especially that of the defendant banks, First Nationwide Mortgage Corporation (First Nationwide), California Federal Bank, FSB (Calfed), and Telebank, in a foreclosure action brought concerning a mortgage loan on a condominium owned by the plaintiff in Cromwell. The lengthy2 revised…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Donna M. Russell v. Equifax A.R.S., and Cbi CollectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Laura Kropelnicki, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Hal Siegel, Linda Strumpf, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Himmelstein v. Town of WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Wilson v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Zirinsky v. ZirinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Little v. Yale UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Berube v. NagleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API