Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Leo James

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 6, 1991No. 89-3119PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Leo James appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiring to transport stolen bonds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and interstate transportation of stolen bonds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

On June 1, 1989, a grand jury returned a seven-count indictment against Robert Har-rod, Roy Ange, Frances Hellinger, Charles Beyer, and the defendant-appellant Leo James, alleging numerous crimes related to the interstate transportation of stolen bonds. Two counts were filed against the defendant James. Count One…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. NeapolitanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. James P. HickokCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Matthew LagroneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Lucky IrorereCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Joseph JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. George Lindemann, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API