Legal Opinion

United States v. Neapolitan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 16, 1986No. Nos. 85-1899, 85-2131 to 85-2136PublishedCited by 207 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

These two unrelated cases have been united because they arise out of similar factual settings, auto theft rings in the Chicago area, and because they both pose the question of the scope of a conspiracy to violate the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). Through these appeals we become the latest in a string of circuits to struggle with what degree of relationship between the defendant and the alleged predicate criminal acts is sufficient to support a conviction for RICO conspiracy under § 1962(d). Based on the literal approach…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by207 opinions

  1. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. BenabeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. James P. HickokCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. DeFries, Clayton E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Alan Masters, Michael J. Corbitt, and James D. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API