Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 18, 1981PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

We hold that a person covered under the personal injury protection coverage (PIP) of the no-fault motor vehicle insurance law (G. L. c. 90, § 34A) may not recover PIP benefits for lost wages when he is killed instantly in a motor vehicle accident.

The case was presented in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston on a stipulation of facts. The plaintiff was the owner of a motor vehicle insured for the year 1978 by the defendant (insurer) for compulsory motor vehicle insurance (including PIP coverage) and certain other coverages, including medical payments insurance. On December 22, 1978, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Gaudette v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Amherst-Pelham Regional School Committee v. Department of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Protective Life Insurance v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Creswell v. Medical West Community Health Plan, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Dominguez v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Boone v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. DiGiacomo v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API