DiGiacomo v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.
The plaintiff, Kristen DiGiacomo, filed this action pursuant to G. L. c. 90, § 34M, to enforce her right to the payment of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under a Massachusetts automobile policy issued by the defendant, Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Metropolitan). Metropolitan did not dispute DiGiacomo’s entitlement to PIP benefits, but calculated them differently from DiGiacomo. On the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, a judge of the District Court ruled that DiGiacomo’s calculation was correct, and that she was entitled to receive $627 in PIP…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Sullivan v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Harvard Crimson, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Okerman v. VA Software Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Libertarian Ass'n v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Cooney v. Compass Group FoodserviceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Cornetta's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Erik Patrick Wells v. Charles T. Miller, Prosecuting AttorneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.