Legal Opinion
Alcuin Willenbring v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1962No. 17783_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
Alcuin Willenbring, appellant herein, was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, of two counts of willful income tax evasion. His appeal to this court from this conviction raises only one point: that the district judge should have disqualified himself fi'om trying the case after an affidavit of bias was filed by appellant pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 144. 1
Appellant’s indictment was filed February 16, 1961; thereafter, certain preliminary matters in connection with his case were handled by District Judge…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Scott v. BeamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- William J. Green, Jr. v. Honorable John W. Murphy, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Hurd v. LettsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Government of Virgin Islands v. GereauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States v. William Alan TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Henry F. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. HallDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- Blixseth v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.