Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 10, 1929No. 12653, 20016PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

In these war risk insurance cases set for trial, motions “for a change of venue” are filed, based on affidavits evidently of “stock” form; for they are identical in language, save that in the latter the masculine pronouns of the former, where not unchanged, áre in instances worked over to the feminine. The latter, omitting formal parts, is as follows:

“That the plaintiff believes that the Honorable George M. Bourquin, Judge of the above entitled Court, before whom said cause is pending, is prejudiced in favor of the defendant herein, and therefore she can not have a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Benedict v. SeiberlingDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1926
  3. United States v. FordDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1925
  4. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Morse v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  2. United States v. HanrahanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
  3. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  4. United States v. GilboyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Beland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API