Legal Opinion

People v. Tonielli

California Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1889No. 20543PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

The defendant was convicted of an attempt to extort money by means of a threatening letter. From the judgment rendered in the premises, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, he appeals.

One ground of alleged error is the insufficiency of the information as against a demurrer interposed thereto. The part of the pleading attacked material to this controversy reads:—

“In the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, the nineteenth day of September, A. D. 1888, A. P. Tonielli, alias Tonielli, is accused by the district attorney by this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. People v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. People v. SingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. EttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Disbarment Proceedings v. BurkeCuyahoga Circuit Court · 1899
  5. State v. ReinoehlIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API